Culture

Stop Asking for A Doctor’s Note: A Logical Conversation

Doctor’s notes are little culture killing pills that cost business a lot more than they are worth.    Most employees are conditioned to offer you a doctor’s note if they miss a day of work.  When we first join the workforce it is usually for a company that employs a lot of entry level workers. Entry level employees are less reliable, change jobs more often, and call in sick a lot.  Therefore, companies that rely on that level of talent begin to develop complex systems that force employees to be more reliable or have their employment terminated.    This is where the notion of getting a doctor’s note comes from.  If you call in sick, you need a doctor’s note so that the company knows you were actually ill.  But what if you weren’t ill?  What if you just wanted the time off?  Almost all of us have those days where we wake up and just don’t want to go to work.  We almost always go (because we’ve learned avoidance doesn’t fix the problem), but there are those days when we just call in sick.    “That’s exactly what that policy is supposed to catch!  It should catch lazy people that don’t want to come to work because they can’t motivate themselves to get to the office or shop.”  Catch them doing what, exactly?  Not being at work?  The employer already knows they aren’t there.    The truth is, it doesn’t matter if they are sick or not.  The employer has a problem because the productivity that the employee was supposed to provide was eliminated by their absence.  Does it really matter why they weren’t there?  The impact on the business is the same either way.    If an employee misses so much time that their position has become unprofitable (or even marginally less productive, or they are out of time off), just terminate the employee.  “But,” many HR people out there would point out, “what if they really are sick?  Are we going to fire them for being ill?”  The answer to that question is “probably not yet.”    People are fired, legally, for being too ill to perform a job all the time.  It’s a long and tedious process, but it can be done.  So why don’t you go through the process, assuming its warranted?  “Doctor’s notes only accomplish two things, 1. They allow managers to avoid difficult conversations with people who call out too much, and 2. They tell your employees how little you trust them.” Whatever the reason, unless you’re discussing utilization of FMLA or accommodations under the ADAAA, doctor’s notes are little more than receipts.  Anybody who has worked much with employees knows that many doctors will sign anything the employee asks them to short of something large enough for a government agency to care about.  Three days being sick with the common cold is easy to put on a note.  But to get this, the employee has to pay.  With the average bill for a visit to your primary care physician being about $120, the cost of the note that says anything you want it to, is $120.    So, why don’t you just tell your employees that if they want to take an unscheduled day off, they just have to pay the company $120?  “Because,” you answer, “some people would gladly pay the fee just to get a couple of days off they couldn’t get any other way.”  Yes.  That is my point.  The only difference is that somebody besides the company is getting paid.    Doctor’s notes only accomplish two things, 1. They allow managers to avoid difficult conversations with people who call out too much, and 2. They tell your employees how little you trust them.  Both reasons are poison to a successful culture.    Successful cultures require managers who are engaged with the employees they lead.  That means when an employee misses a few days claiming to be ill, the manager reaches out to them and shows concern for their health, offers to help, and cares about their financial well-being.  Additionally, they should contact HR and notify them of the situation because, if the illness is significant enough for them to miss more than a couple of days, it might be covered by FMLA or the ADA.    It’s a lot easier for a manager to not go the extra mile for an employee, not care how much time they miss, or have a difficult conversation with a team member missing too much time.  Instead, they resort to distrust and accusation.  And that’s where doctor’s notes come in.    You don’t think that employees can’t tell when you don’t trust them?  If you don’t trust them, do you think they’ll trust you?    What is the answer?  Treat your employees like adults, hold them accountable for the outcomes they produce, and be honest with them when you’re worried about their performance.  That includes missing too many days.    (The above, obviously doesn’t apply federally mandated processes related to FMLA requests and the “interactive process” required by the ADAAA. These processes require medical confirmation of employee claims and usually large amounts of time off.) 

Stop Asking for A Doctor’s Note: A Logical Conversation Read More »

The Grange - Strategic HR Consulting

HR Doesn’t Have to Suck

Most HR People Suck.   Seven years ago, I stood before a crowd of 300 to 400 HR professionals and started my presentation with that phrase. Every day, when I met with potential clients, I got the same reaction: HR was necessary but seen as a cost center—not worth paying extra for and meant to do little more than keep the company out of court.   At that time, HR professionals were still reeling from Fast Company’s article, “Why We Hate HR,” even though it had been published more than seven years earlier. They clamored for a seat at the table but struggled to justify it. Most HR courses and seminars, even those billed for experienced professionals, focused on compliance—how to adhere to specific laws and properly complete I-9 forms.   We’ve come a long way since then, yet, in many ways, not far at all.   Recently, LinkedIn has been full of posts pontificating on variations of “Culture isn’t HR’s job; it’s the CEO’s.” The authors of these posts vent their growing frustration with corporate virtue signaling companies publicly claiming to value employees while internally fostering toxic cultures. They point fingers at leadership and demand accountability.   The problem is: HR does own the company’s culture.   HR owns culture in the same way a CFO owns the financial health of a company. If a CEO refuses to follow the advice of the company’s culture expert, they are making the same mistake as ignoring the CFO’s financial recommendations.   So, what should an HR professional do when company leadership refuses to take direct steps to improve workplace culture?   They should resign.. “HR owns culture in the same way a CFO owns the financial health of a company.”  However, many HR professionals refuse to resign or seek employment elsewhere, even when their best recommendations are ignored. If you work at a company riddled with red flags, and leadership dismisses your concerns without meaningful action, why are you still working there? They don’t value your input. Eventually, the company will pay the price, and your professional reputation will be tied to that failure.   Leaving a job is scary, but being another mediocre HR professional is just as bad. No wonder employees think we suck at our jobs—we espouse high ideals yet provide little more than a fig leaf for toxic work cultures.   There are many reasons HR falls short of success, but this is one of the biggest: we don’t demand competence from leadership. CEOs who don’t implement sound management practices don’t value sound management practices. CEOs who don’t require their managers to implement them don’t value them. CEOs who ignore good business advice regarding culture don’t value culture. Culture is king, and it is the responsibility of HR. We don’t need to complain about it on LinkedIn, point fingers, or abdicate our responsibilities.     In short, we don’t need to suck.

HR Doesn’t Have to Suck Read More »

The Culture King Speaks

Culture is King

The importance of culture seems to be axiomatic lately.  I hear how important culture is everywhere from HR conferences to broadcasts of NFL games.  Everybody seems to understand the idea that culture is important.  Is it really? First, let’s define what is meant by culture.  Culture is the sum of all interactions within an organization.  OK… that’s easy to say, but what does that look like in practice?  If most communication with employees is managers giving dictates and not asking for input from front line employees, it means that part of the company culture is a top down command structure where employees don’t have input into decisions.  Think of it as the graphic showing your volume on your phone.  It’s not all on or all off, it’s usually somewhere in between.  How much influence that one particular aspect of your company culture has on the outcome of your business is relative to the other aspects of your culture.    Then let’s define “good company culture”.  This gets a little more difficult because not all organizations play in the same arena.  For example, a “good” culture working at Minky Couture is probably very different from a “good” culture at the Chicago Bears.  Therefore, a “good company culture” has to be defined as the culture that produces the best results for the organization over time.   It’s important to note however, as Jim Collins points out in his landmark book Good to Great, that cultures can sometimes produce incredible results over a period of time, but not be able to sustain them.  For the purpose of this article, we’ll note that a “good culture” is one that facilitates the successful achievement of the company’s objectives over a long period of time.    Of course, all of this points out the nuanced nature of culture and how difficult it is to quickly assess it until you’ve lived it.  It is possible, however, after some study, to find commonalities between successful cultures that seem generalized across industry and time.  If that is done, we begin to see how important culture can be.    Examples of this abound.  According to a research study published by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) in December of 2024, 57% of employees who rated their culture as poor said that “they are actively or soon will be looking for another job.”  While the study didn’t mention who those employees were, I think we can reasonably assume they are the employees who are most likely to get another job.  In other words, they are better performers over all.    SHRM also noted that more than a quarter of employees who found their company culture lacking, said they were “burned out.”      In the light of this, an argument could be made that Jim Collin’s work, more than anything, underlined this one fact: all success is downwind of culture.    Employees who are “engaged” are more productive, more efficient, and solve problems on their own instead of taking it to leadership for a solution.  They are, in short, focused on their jobs and giving it their full attention with the goal of improving it.  They look to build the organization and take personal satisfaction from doing so.  As Sunnie Giles notes in her book, The New Science of Radical Innovation, this is a fundamental component of companies that radically transform their industries.  It can’t be done without engaged human capital revolutionizing processes to produce a better result.    If all of this is true, the natural response from managers should be to make culture their highest priority.  Do nothing to damage it, do anything to enhance it, and then nurture its growth.    In short, culture is king.

Culture is King Read More »